Validation of Smartphone Based Retinal Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIM To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of "fundus on phone' (FOP) camera, a smartphone based retinal imaging system, as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy (DR) detection and DR severity in comparison with 7-standard field digital retinal photography. DESIGN Single-site, prospective, comparative, instrument validation study. METHODS 301 patients (602 eyes) with type 2 diabetes underwent standard seven-field digital fundus photography with both Carl Zeiss fundus camera and indigenous FOP at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India. Grading of DR was performed by two independent retina specialists using modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grading system. Sight threatening DR (STDR) was defined by the presence of proliferative DR(PDR) or diabetic macular edema. The sensitivity, specificity and image quality were assessed. RESULTS The mean age of the participants was 53.5 ±9.6 years and mean duration of diabetes 12.5±7.3 years. The Zeiss camera showed that 43.9% had non-proliferative DR(NPDR) and 15.3% had PDR while the FOP camera showed that 40.2% had NPDR and 15.3% had PDR. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting any DR by FOP was 92.7% (95%CI 87.8-96.1) and 98.4% (95%CI 94.3-99.8) respectively and the kappa (ĸ) agreement was 0.90 (95%CI-0.85-0.95 p<0.001) while for STDR, the sensitivity was 87.9% (95%CI 83.2-92.9), specificity 94.9% (95%CI 89.7-98.2) and ĸ agreement was 0.80 (95%CI 0.71-0.89 p<0.001), compared to conventional photography. CONCLUSION Retinal photography using FOP camera is effective for screening and diagnosis of DR and STDR with high sensitivity and specificity and has substantial agreement with conventional retinal photography.
منابع مشابه
The Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Workflow: Potential for Smartphone Imaging.
Complications of diabetes mellitus, namely diabetic retinopathy and diabetic maculopathy, are the leading cause of blindness in working aged people. Sufferers can avoid blindness if identified early via retinal imaging. Systematic screening of the diabetic population has been shown to greatly reduce the prevalence and incidence of blindness within the population. Many national screening program...
متن کاملEffectiveness of non-mydriatic retinal photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
This is a prospective study to compare the effectiveness of non-mydriatic photography with that of direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy in 153 patients attending a hospital clinic in Hong Kong. Retinal photography under physiological mydriasis and direct ophthalmoscopy of patients with dilated pupils were compared with the ophthalmologists' examination results as a refere...
متن کاملTwo-field photography can identify patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy: a screening approach in the primary care setting.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of two 45 degrees photographic fields per eye in the screening for diabetic retinopathy with the routine ophthalmologist's examination and to study the effectiveness of visual acuity measurement in the detection of diabetic macular edema. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Type 1 and 2 diabetic patients without a known history of more than minimal retinopathy (...
متن کاملEffectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy--a systematic review.
AIMS To determine which screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy are most effective and under what circumstances. METHODS A systematic review of the English language literature, published from 1983 to April 1999. RESULTS Available studies are generally limited in their ability to answer the important questions on the effectiveness of tests for early detection of diabetic reti...
متن کاملAssessment of non-mydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy.
Non-mydriatic retinal photography with later interpretation of the photographs was assessed as a screening method for the detection of diabetic retinopathy; when compared with an ophthalmologist's clinical assessment in a random group of 62 diabetic patients it was accurate (false negative 6.8%, false positive 2%) and sensitive (sensitivity 96%, specificity 98%). The assessment of further manag...
متن کامل